From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 13:18:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6C758FB; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DE8CAE0; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F2FBDC3E; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:18:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1141DBDC1D; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:18:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615F66127; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:18:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA976A0AF71; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:18:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:18:16 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Mathieu Arnold , Bryan Drewery , Andrej Zverev , Adam Weinberger Subject: Re: svn commit: r347936 - in head: . japanese japanese/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin japanese/spamassassin mail mail/claws-mail-spamassassin mail/evolution mail/exim mail/isbg mail/mailscanner mail/mimedefang m... Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <0AB3D3B2A20C8B5B91F7C188@ogg.in.absolight.net> References: <201403112149.s2BLneVw006063@svn.freebsd.org> <5320570D.5060709@FreeBSD.org> <0AB3D3B2A20C8B5B91F7C188@ogg.in.absolight.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:18:19 -0000 +--On 12 mars 2014 14:06:43 +0100 Mathieu Arnold wrote: | +--On 12 mars 2014 07:46:05 -0500 Bryan Drewery | wrote: || On 3/11/2014 9:56 PM, Andrej Zverev wrote: ||> I think since p5-Mail-SA has a long history in ports tree, you ||> (can/need/good idea) also send short annonce of such changes to ||> port-announce@ and ports@ maillists. || || No, MOVED is sufficient. We never send ports@ or ports-announce@ for || renamed origins. Even UPDATING is not conventional in this case. | | MOVED is not sufficient, people using binary packages only will have to | guess what they should do when pkg upgrade tells them they have a | conflict. Ok, sorry, not making the right point here. MOVED is sufficient in the way that we don't need to announce this to the mailing lists. portupgrade and portmaster read it, and take care of doing the right translations. It leaves people who don't have /usr/ports because they use binary upgrades, sending emails won't help pkg figure out what to do in that case, but it's a topic for another day. -- Mathieu Arnold