From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 29 12:51:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D1D1065673; Fri, 29 May 2009 12:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386798FC08; Fri, 29 May 2009 12:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id PAA22325; Fri, 29 May 2009 15:51:27 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4A1FDA4E.6030506@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:51:26 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090406) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jung-uk Kim References: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308582E0E5016@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <200905211834.43324.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4A1C13BA.9040508@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4A1C13BA.9040508@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPICA version 20090521 released X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:51:31 -0000 on 26/05/2009 19:07 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 22/05/2009 01:34 Jung-uk Kim said the following: >> I just uploaded a new patchset against -CURRENT: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica-import-20090521.diff.gz >> >> Please note that I am planning on merging it before 8.0 release. >> Therefore, it needs more regression tests and serious code reviews >> now. > > Just in case, here is an incremental diff from previous JK's import. > Gonna start testing tomorrow. Testing on two systems hasn't shown any regressions - one is based 440BX/PIIX4, the other is amd64 based on ICH9R. -- Andriy Gapon