From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 17:05:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89AE16A4CE for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:05:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from scrat.cs.umu.se (scrat.cs.umu.se [130.239.40.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F6343D2F for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:05:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tdv94ped@cs.umu.se) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by amavisd-new (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA3F18043F; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:05:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cs.umu.se (h228n4c1o1100.bredband.skanova.com [81.225.27.228]) by scrat.cs.umu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54662180434; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:05:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <415453E2.6020305@cs.umu.se> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:05:38 +0200 From: Paul Everlund User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikhail Teterin References: <200409231710.i8NHAOLl029101@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200409231710.i8NHAOLl029101@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.umu.se cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/71521: [Maintainer update] comms/hylafax 4.1.8 -> 4.2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:05:48 -0000 Hi Mikhail! With the patch-configure, included in my send-pr, it should compile on 5.x. Great though you did notice that repeated man page, and as I wrote personally to you, you are welcome to fix it! As I also wrote, my Makefile diff does not take the BROKEN part in counter, as I hadn't that in my Makefile while working on it, so you are welcome to fix that too. :-) > Is it normal for the configure to ask to "Press Return to Continue" > before displaying the "HylaFAX configuration parameters"? If I recall it correct it makes some guesses about the environment, then asks the uer to press return, then the user can change various parameters. It has done so as long as I've been a maintainer, and I did only remove those paramaters that the uer should not change. > I don't remember it doing this before -- does the port need the > INTERACTIVE setting or something? That I do not know. :-) The port should probably be made in such way, that one can give all parameters on the command line when doing make, and the configure patch should then remove the press return thing. Best regards, Paul