From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Aug 16 03:52:04 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id DAA24748 for bugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 03:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perki0.connect.com.au (perki0.connect.com.au [192.189.54.85]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA24729 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 03:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by perki0.connect.com.au id UAA24245 (8.7.5/IDA-1.6); Fri, 16 Aug 1996 20:51:01 +1000 (EST) >Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nemeton.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA15388; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 18:51:16 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <199608160851.SAA15388@nemeton.com.au> To: Bill Paul cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, clary@elec.uq.edu.au Subject: Re: rarpd stops working on FreeBSD 2.1.5-RELEASE In-reply-to: <199608152219.SAA12997@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 18:51:16 +1000 From: Giles Lean Content-Type: text Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 15 Aug 1996 18:19:28 -0400 (EDT) Bill Paul wrote: > > I suspect it's being rarely used this days, so pending bugs are less > > likely to be found than for many other software. > > Don't say things like that. All parts of the OS are important. Joerg didn't say it wasn't important, just that it was less used. Less used code generates less bug reports. Heavily used code generates more bug reports. Law of nature. ;-) Giles