From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Wed Oct 21 09:39:25 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7854DA1BD1D
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:39:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64438F65
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:39:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t9L9dP28089587
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:39:25 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 203910] www/sogo: Update to 2.3.2_2. Fix compiler warnings.
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:39:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: euan@potensol.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: merge-quarterly?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-203910-13-tIqjDBukud@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-203910-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-203910-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:39:25 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203910

--- Comment #13 from Euan Thoms <euan@potensol.com> ---
(In reply to David Chisnall from comment #12)

I agree with your logic completely, and I did ponder about this. The thing is,
it's marked experimental because ActiveSync is new and I've heard it can be a
PITA to get working right. But perhaps I'm confusing it with OpenChange. I want
to encourage feedback since I don't use it myself. I think if they have to
actively engage in the port option, and report back with good results, and
suggest making it default. That will give me more confidence.

Kubilay, Kurt, Martin, your thoughts? Cast your votes if you wish.

Certainly I will make a slave port, if possible. When I get some time and I'm
confident the ActiveSync plugin works OK on FreeBSD.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.