From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 18 18:12:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F149D16A417 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:12:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tota@rtfm.jp) Received: from smaster4.hi-ho.ne.jp (smaster4.hi-ho.ne.jp [202.224.159.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D6C13C469 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:12:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tota@rtfm.jp) Received: from cam.hi-ho.ne.jp (sproxy35 [192.168.125.211]) by smaster4.hi-ho.ne.jp (hi-ho Mail Server) with ESMTP id <0JT900L7U9582U@smaster4.hi-ho.ne.jp>; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:12:44 +0900 (JST) Received: from mebius (p2059-ipbf408hiraide.tochigi.ocn.ne.jp [123.222.207.59]) by cam.hi-ho.ne.jp id MH8K42D0; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:12:44 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:12:45 +0900 From: TAKATSU Tomonari In-reply-to: <200712181606.lBIG6JNJ070917@freefall.freebsd.org> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Message-id: <20071219021245.099e0c9c.tota@rtfm.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 071217-0, 2007/12/17), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean References: <200712181606.lBIG6JNJ070917@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/118775: [MAINTAINER] www/tdiary-devel: tDiary 2.1.4 contains a vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:12:46 -0000 > Shouldn't we remove tdiary-devel port, once tdiary port is updated to 2.2.0? No, we shouldn't. tDiary-devel is going to be prepared 2.3.x. (http://www.tdiary.org/20021112.html written in Japanese) regards, On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:06:19 GMT pav@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] www/tdiary-devel: tDiary 2.1.4 contains a vulnerability > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: pav > State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 18 16:04:42 UTC 2007 > State-Changed-Why: > Committed, thanks. > > Shouldn't we remove tdiary-devel port, once tdiary port is updated to 2.2.0? > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->pav > Responsible-Changed-By: pav > Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Dec 18 16:04:42 UTC 2007 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Track > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118775 -- TAKATSU Tomonari