From owner-freebsd-commit  Tue Oct 10 05:18:04 1995
Return-Path: owner-commit
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id FAA00888
          for freebsd-commit-outgoing; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 05:18:04 -0700
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id FAA00876
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 05:18:00 -0700
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id FAA00866
          for cvs-sys-outgoing; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 05:17:57 -0700
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA00860
          ; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 05:17:43 -0700
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id FAA02588; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 05:17:40 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id FAA00308; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 05:17:39 -0700
Message-Id: <199510101217.FAA00308@corbin.Root.COM>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/ibcs2 - Imported sources 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 10 Oct 95 04:53:06 PDT."
             <2443.813325986@time.cdrom.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 05:17:39 -0700
Sender: owner-commit@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> IMHO, it really should have waited till after 2.1 was out, because David 
>> has explicitly requested to hold back on importing stuff as it was making 
>> his life difficult.  There are other things that some of us are holding 
>> back on for this reason.. It's kinda annoying to see others bypass the 
>> request...    Sigh. Oh well.
>
>Well, there's no code freeze on 2.2 that I'm aware of - work should be
>allowed to go forward in 2.2-current.  I think David's objections are
>more to all the commits with the little "please put this in 2.1"
>postit notes attached.  AFAIK, Steven has no intention of trying to
>get this into 2.1.

   Bruce and a few other had (have) grand plans about making sweeping
prototype changes in the kernel. I asked that this wait for a bit because
it would make bringing in changes from -current extremely difficult.
...but as for new code, no, this isn't a problem for me.

-DG