From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 22 21:46:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BAD37B401 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net (smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net [203.16.214.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2ADB43FBD for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:46:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Malcolm.Kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp1831.sa.padsl.internode.on.net [150.101.26.38]) h3N4kgZe080164; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:16:43 +0930 (CST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" From: Malcolm Kay Organization: At home To: Chris Pockele , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:22:55 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <20030421170801.GA23306@freedaemon.home.lan> <200304221410.29115.Malcolm.Kay@internode.on.net> <20030422125218.GA544@freedaemon.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20030422125218.GA544@freedaemon.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200304231422.55230.Malcolm.Kay@internode.on.net> Subject: Re: floppy drive problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 04:46:51 -0000 On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 22:22, Chris Pockele wrote: > > > > nomad# dd if=3D/dev/fd0a /mnt > > > > dd: unknown operand /mnt > > > > > > Incorrect use of dd. > > Indeed, this was just a mistake that got copy-pasted along :). > > > Notice all Chris's commands address a ufs partition, and the errors c= ome > > from fd0c -- again a ufs concept. The disk is not set up with ufs but > > FAT12 so these do not exist. > > Using fd0a instead of fd0 works fine on another machine. > And doesn't fd0c mean "the whole disk" anyway? > I stand corrected, looking at output from: # ls -l /dev/fd0* I see that fd0 and fd0a to fd0h all have same major/minor device numbers. I still have some difficulty believing there is a hardware fault; but cou= ld accept the idea of some hardware peculiarity that FreeBSD does not allow for. To my mind the messages under linux seem to support the=20 possibility; but obviously I'm now well outside my region of competance. Malcolm