From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug  7 18:27:19 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610F116A423;
	Sun,  7 Aug 2005 18:27:19 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293EE43E54;
	Sun,  7 Aug 2005 18:01:19 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j77IDH6L007493;
	Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:13:17 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Message-ID: <42F64C6A.5010407@samsco.org>
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:01:14 -0600
From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050615
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
References: <42F47C0D.2020704@freebsd.org>
	<20050806092232.GA850@zaphod.nitro.dk>
	<42F489DC.1080400@freebsd.org>
	<20050807115927.GA851@zaphod.nitro.dk>
	<20050807173003.GA7290@soaustin.net>
	<42F646B9.7020703@samsco.org> <42F64990.4090005@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <42F64990.4090005@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed 
	version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org
Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:27:20 -0000

Colin Percival wrote:
> Scott Long wrote:
> 
>>I think that portsnap is a very good feature and I'm ready to tout it
>>for the 6.0 release.  The technical problems, such as they are, are
>>pretty insignificant and are just about solved.
> 
> 
> Umm... *shuffles feet*... I wasn't planning on having portsnap in the
> base system for FreeBSD 6.0.  I'd rather give it a couple of months to
> settle in and MFC it before FreeBSD 5.5 and FreeBSD 6.1.  People can
> always install it from the ports tree until then.
> 
> Unless you really want an insta-MFC in the middle of a release freeze,
> of course...
> 
> Colin Percival

Ah, sorry, I'm just too eager I guess =-)

Scott