From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 24 07:23:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id A06071065671; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:23:32 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Wesley Shields Message-ID: <20080724072332.GA96349@FreeBSD.org> References: <200807240244.m6O2iH1h069500@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200807240244.m6O2iH1h069500@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:23:32 -0000 On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:44:17AM +0000, Wesley Shields wrote: > wxs 2008-07-24 02:44:17 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > sysutils/fusefs-kmod distinfo > Log: > Distfile re-rolled. According to the maintainer all that changed was > some mercurial files were removed. I would probably disagree that "according to maintainer" is enough here, especially since this port is kernel module (and rather popular one). I would suggest that responsible committer obtain both distfiles and double check no malicious changes are introduced. ./danfe