From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 30 19:40:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A241065679 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4C88FC0A for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBUJe4fo068373 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBUJe4P6068372; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:40:04 GMT Message-Id: <200912301940.nBUJe4P6068372@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org From: Manuel Tobias Schiller Cc: Subject: Re: sparc64/142102: FreeBSD 8.0 kernel panics on sparc64 when accessing NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Manuel Tobias Schiller List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:40:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR sparc64/142102; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Manuel Tobias Schiller To: Marius Strobl Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sparc64/142102: FreeBSD 8.0 kernel panics on sparc64 when accessing NFS Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:36:31 +0100 On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:08:01 +0100 Marius Strobl wrote: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:25:55AM +0100, Manuel Tobias Schiller wrote: > > > I managed to compile and test a kernel with your updated patch, and > > things seem to work. I'll try to stress-test it over the night by > > copying a few tens of gigabytes over and report back with the > > results. Also, if I'm reading your patch correctly, we should be able > > to do without the bcopy hack from PR 140797, so I'll recompile a > > kernel without it and try if that works as well. > > I don't think so; nfs_realign() only guarantees 4-byte alignment > as required by XDR and assumed by nfsm_srvmtofh_xx() further down > the road but nfsfh_t needs 8-byte alignment. Of course, you are right. When I tried it, I got my well deserved panic again. I should have looked at the code of nfs_realign much more carefully... Anyway, thanks again! Manuel -- Homepage: http://www.hinterbergen.de/mala OpenPGP: 0xA330353E (DSA) or 0xD87D188C (RSA)