From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 20:11:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBCC16A420 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:11:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 185EA13C4E9 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 23211 invoked by uid 399); 24 Jan 2008 20:11:17 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2008 20:11:17 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <4798F0E3.1030401@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:11:15 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200801240236.m0O2awrw054388@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080124181741.GA37539@tirith.brixandersen.dk> In-Reply-To: <20080124181741.GA37539@tirith.brixandersen.dk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:11:19 -0000 Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > Hi Doug, > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 02:36:58AM +0000, Doug Barton wrote: >> dougb 2008-01-24 02:36:58 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: (Branch: 2.0) >> ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in >> Log: >> The code for this 2.0 version has been totally reorganized, and >> in several cases totally rewritten. I am also glad to say that >> all of the advertised features now work as advertised. :) > ... > > Did you just branch the ports CVS repo? No, it's just a version number bump. AFAICT the "branch" stuff above is added by the script that generates the e-mail. If you look at the cvs logs themselves you can see that there are no branches. But your concern is reasonable, I had a moment of panic myself when I saw the e-mail. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection