From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr  1 14:17:24 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB07BF4
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Apr 2013 14:17:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com (mail-pd0-f171.google.com
 [209.85.192.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90088A9
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Apr 2013 14:17:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pd0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z10so1251094pdj.30
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 07:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=google.com; s=20120113;
 h=x-received:sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from
 :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references
 :to:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state;
 bh=cKWww2eRmx5bvNSBWro4sMgJpFjI0tzMRFVV3uBVCc0=;
 b=JBsJCHcNhAygTJFBoiCI/BpYCAkv7qksyEHxtb8lBUqmBy6Faj08XNcGhPel0BVhXz
 Qm/KRrDRqOCQHpEJScw6GyppKBv+r/sp3m/mKpjehPfC4a9QgYXdd7rmNDhIIUViR1FM
 7ONsx0AWQy560uSi1KCStKR2RBrtaY7Z0dbvEEdQ5jNwGiHpLVrMU+9iocW6TP1zQo1R
 BgH4EcSidwSmadHXs8u5lX5hR0ay+r0lNO2X3BX651HLP6pJAedijJm9dxpKFsK5XB48
 owZ/qYKmM6mEw4znbNi/eNXC3bVtrhHPrfgc9N5799i1s0hFqu682m88e4AEj8iD6TWB
 I28Q==
X-Received: by 10.66.13.35 with SMTP id e3mr19248852pac.186.1364825843233;
 Mon, 01 Apr 2013 07:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 53.imp.bsdimp.com
 (50-78-194-198-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.78.194.198])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lb8sm15496374pab.13.2013.04.01.07.17.20
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Mon, 01 Apr 2013 07:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Warner Losh <wlosh@bsdimp.com>
Subject: Re: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <201304011331.r31DVCJw052856@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:17:18 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <432EFDBB-9CE8-480A-8B6A-8171BA9F4A83@bsdimp.com>
References: <201304011331.r31DVCJw052856@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmQdBWWT11O2HjZvvtwJ6iXIblSd0oOo4IEb2FY36+jdmPHQIjbojcIN+MxP3dPaaBtXX0w
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, lists@eitanadler.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:17:24 -0000


On Apr 1, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:

> 	From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
> 	Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 00:48:08 -0400
> 	Subject: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture
> 	To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers =
<freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
>=20
> 	should drop support for the i386 architecture for 10.0 to tier 2
> 	and replace it with the ARM architecture as Tier 1.
>=20
> don't care for i386, don't use it anymore.
>=20
> Is ARM really ready for tier 1?
> Including the ports infrastructure?
> Installation images?

It is certainly getting close, at least for the newer armv6+ boards.

Warner