From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 17:04:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D00106564A for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mamuskus@edatel.com.co) Received: from edatel-imsva-01.edatel.com.co (edatel-imsva-01.edatel.com.co [190.109.177.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A078FC0A for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:04:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edatel-imsva-01.edatel.com.co (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA80 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4290B47805B for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:36:00 -0500 (COT) Received: from correo.edatel.com.co (unknown [10.4.1.76]) by edatel-imsva-01.edatel.com.co (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B8C47805A for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:36:00 -0500 (COT) Received: from [10.4.4.116] (10.4.4.116) by edatel-hbt-02 (10.4.1.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.213.0; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:36:11 -0500 Message-ID: <4FE34DEC.9070908@edatel.com.co> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:38:04 -0500 From: Marco Antonio Muskus Muskus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <9672338A-45DA-4680-977B-253CEF3201C8@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9672338A-45DA-4680-977B-253CEF3201C8@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:04:45 -0000 ZFS is superior to UFS. End of the history. There is no point in use old technology (UFS) when the new one can make the= same as the older and better ? Regards, El 21/06/12 11:31, Matthias Gamsjager escribi=F3: On 21 jun. 2012, at 18:07, Wojciech Puchar = wrote: stupid answer to stupid question. You never seen - but they do happens. In other topic you hammerd on fact and if someone ask you to deliver them = its a stupid question. just a proof it is a waste of time to explain things (FOR FREE) for people = like you. You are free to make dangerous setups. People are free to hire you and beli= eve at things what you do. People are free to then pay consequences of the = results at unexpected time, as well as 10 times oversized hardware for a ne= ed. At least this is still free :) True but this applies as much to you. You think you know it all and that is= quite the probdlem with you. And "discussing" with you is a true waste with this attittute. Even its fr= ee. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing= list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " -- MARCO ANTONIO MUSKUS MUSKUS NOC - Aplicaciones ISP EDATEL S.A. E.S.P. Calle 41 # 52 - 28 Piso 2 Medell=EDn, Antioquia - Colombia Tel=E9fono: (574) 384 6507 Fax: (574) 3846500 www.edatel.net.co mamuskus@edatel.com.co ________________________________ Este mensaje y/o sus anexos son para uso exclusivo de su destinatario inten= cional y puede contener informaci=F3n legalmente protegida por ser confiden= cial. Si usted no es el destinatario intencional del mensaje por favor inf= =F3rmenos de inmediato y elim=EDnelo, as=ED como sus anexos. Igualmente, le= comunicamos que cualquier retenci=F3n, revisi=F3n no autorizada, distribuc= i=F3n, divulgaci=F3n, reenv=EDo, copia, impresi=F3n, reproducci=F3n, o uso = indebido de este mensaje y/o sus anexos, est=E1 estrictamente prohibida y s= ancionada legalmente. EDATEL S.A. no se hace responsable en ning=FAn caso p= or da=F1os derivados de la recepci=F3n del presente mensaje.