From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 2 02:47:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E91A16A417 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2007 02:47:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QZ=321c94ff@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5739613C447 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2007 02:47:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QZ=321c94ff@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EBD81642F8 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 21:26:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4727D05B5 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 21:26:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 02:26:34 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071202022634.332bfc33@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <200712012053.41426.mike.jeays@rogers.com> References: <539c60b90712010929m7fef7020v806eb3c1eb24d066@mail.gmail.com> <4751C1EF.4010206@daleco.biz> <200712012053.41426.mike.jeays@rogers.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: using dd to duplicate disks/partitions of slightly different sizes - works? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:47:00 -0000 On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 20:53:41 -0500 Mike Jeays wrote: > I tried using dd with two 80GB disks, using a much larger block size > (512M), booting Knoppix to make sure the filesystems on the 'input' > disk were quiescent. It worked, but took an amazing 14 hours, which > is only about 1.5 Mb/sec. The 'output' drive was on an IDE connector > shared with the CD device, so that may have been a cause of the poor > performance. > Probably that was the cause, I've done a few: dd if=/dev/random of= bs=1m recently, and they all went an order of magnitude faster than that, even on PATA drives.