From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 21 13:46:00 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122F6106564A;
	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:45:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com
	[209.85.212.178])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCA68FC08;
	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:45:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so1212453wib.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 06:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=KYjKlrcDSxvOZCRx2bymiMa4pVU0AeuKl6Krj6Gzdfw=;
	b=s5IdI/BjSKmKnGj0N4dLyzM/CNGl6NDunRmRqEQlduuHMvhHTJCwy+RGb8pUvh9MVS
	pesaH/Bb+14z2K6He6USiuTYLNYLd9O0YV81odWnxwwLj7GcE6LSgJVm8kamDIGhSRJe
	u9l9X4y9V0Vg1tb7mF0SPEmWCH6JeQEc3UbAm8IFQ1zJ9ZJ3KW/B26vSzAzPhQzVPZG1
	kPDsuuyuk7G0q/qugCQD81Ydb3TASBH62aamGOLJftSPW3uXfr0UgAAkschtVXDrG7lD
	VELHXDzKtAwYvh5bhLuURJu3voUOEylsfJWNQIgmXTRk2wk4RHc5+ufXoat8cUJ4hGPl
	3rNA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.132.226 with SMTP id o76mr5985055wei.93.1335015957902;
	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 06:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.85.71 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 06:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201204202137.q3KLbhNj056524@svn.freebsd.org>
References: <201204202137.q3KLbhNj056524@svn.freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:45:57 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFMmRNy6Ew_A1+CAq5Off+NxYxEMBHs8ZgfyG7pvVbbR9sCk7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>
To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org,
	src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r234504 - in head/sys: amd64/conf i386/conf
X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current
	<svn-src-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:46:00 -0000

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Author: brooks
> Date: Fri Apr 20 21:37:42 2012
> New Revision: 234504
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/234504
>
> Log:
> =A0Enable DTrace hooks in GENERIC.
>
> =A0Reviewed by: =A0gnn
> =A0Approved by: =A0core (jhb, imp)
> =A0Requested by: a cast of thousands
> =A0MFC after: =A0 =A03 days

Excellent!  Thanks to everybody who helped make this happen, starting
with the participants at dtrace.conf who gave us the requisite whacks
with the clue-by-four.

However, what is our policy for enabling features in -STABLE that are
known to be unstable?  If we MFC this I don't have the slightest worry
that somebody might see instability in their system just because the
hooks are all of a sudden there, but I would worry that somebody make
take DTrace hooks being enabled in GENERIC on -STABLE to imply that
DTrace is stable, start using it and being upset when they trip over a
DTrace bug.