From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 22:32:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62345636; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:32:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76E9BFA; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5123FD13.8030508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:30:43 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130128 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> <5123D2F6.5040909@aldan.algebra.com> <5123D65D.2030301@FreeBSD.org> <5123DAF9.50400@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <5123DAF9.50400@aldan.algebra.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Chadd , office@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:32:32 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-19 15:05:13 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 19.02.2013 14:45, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> Actually, I tried very hard to build sane LO with gcc 4.2 but it >> wasn't fruitful. Eventually, I gave up on adding kludges after >> kludges because LO is moving away from pre-C++11 compilers >> anyway. :-( > Should not a pre-C++11 compiler simply /fail/ upon encountering > C++11 code? configure script detects the C++ compiler and sets various compiler flags. It basically tries to work around *known* issues as much as possible. However, it does not cover every possible combination. "Moving away" means "not actively tested". >>> And if there is a *good* reason to reject the base compiler, >>> I'd expect such good reason to be documented -- preferably >>> with bug-reports filed against either the FreeBSD and its >>> toolchain or against the LibreOffice code. Or both... >> I believe there were plenty PRs already. > I can not find any :-( The ones against FreeBSD > > > all talk about build failures (except the 176269 > , filed > today). There are no relevant bug-reports against LibreOffice, that > mention "gcc-4.2.1" > > > or "gcc 4.2.1 > ". Okay, > sorry. I really love to build LO with GCC 4.2, too. I really do. However, I don't see much point of mentioning that fact in PR. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRI/0TAAoJECXpabHZMqHOsy0IANi1KZSRdqARfxJ65r1MLi4a tQkCq7LmyMNA81ND1GKAatg52UDLF2GN5o9Yw71l/XiYN2JV667aGVaF9e96a789 ONnXRWaGw2DohTH8SpGu81Vstj5Vn/iots4b0bFdhz3HCW6lTgUsqlD/+n3dVVpo c4MlUAFtEhpqejvsX7g10kPqn8IZwZc7pBUfoeSw1sMIChajxmlfXDlHkvtKwVJu jHbu2PDMwty2kgJ1kRdYNt5yZXl9chSuSxqy23O5odfHyLWV6+SGk+SOb32MSp7H /oJ0UdFLFzqwGSqlK7bDOMIyL0yLaPz5WJd8X+HC/BmR5FUugdILe8lHOeJ/rq0= =ZyWD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----