Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 21:13:52 +1100 (EDT) From: Andrew MacIntyre <andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au> To: genght@cn.ibm.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE box more slow than slackware3.5 box? Message-ID: <Pine.OS2.3.95.990210211031.223A-100000@CENTRAL> In-Reply-To: <48256714.00124BCC.00@cn.ibm.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999 genght@cn.ibm.com wrote:
> I have two boxes that have the same hardware.One is FreeBSD2.2.8-RELEASE
> and the other is Slackware3.5.
> They are using the same Intel 10/100 NIC and attaching to the same 10/100
> Bay 450T switch.But when I ftp/telnet to my FreeBSD box(either from win95
> client or from linux client),it responded after a very very long time (I
> think it is dead,but not.)But the linux box work perfectly.
{...}
make sure that the machine you're telnet/ftp'ing from is
reverse-resolvable, either by DNS or /etc/hosts. By default, FreeBSD does
a reverse lookup on the incoming IP address to use a name for logging (at
least that's my experience with 2.2.[567]).
--
Andrew I MacIntyre "These thoughts are mine alone..."
E-mail: andrew.macintyre@aba.gov.au (work) | Snail: PO Box 370
andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au (play) | Belconnen ACT 2616
Fido: Andrew MacIntyre, 3:620/243.18 | Australia
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OS2.3.95.990210211031.223A-100000>