From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 26 21:08:06 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DF216A4CF
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:08:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from imo-m28.mx.aol.com (imo-m28.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.9])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D109243D1D
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:08:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from TM4525@aol.com)
Received: from TM4525@aol.com
	by imo-m28.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id v.1d4.2df7fa8c (4254);
	Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:07:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: TM4525@aol.com
Message-ID: <1d4.2df7fa8c.2eb016a6@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:07:50 EDT
To: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5114
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Serious investigations into UNIX and Windows
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:08:06 -0000

In a message dated 10/26/04 3:38:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
keramida@ceid.upatras.gr writes:
>The fact that Cisco does something wrong doesn't somehow make it right for
>Windows.  It's not a good excuse either.

Its the way it is, and the way its always been.