From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  9 02:25:34 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09C416A4CE
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  9 Feb 2004 02:25:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns.tern.ru (mail.tern.ru [195.210.170.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970C243D1D
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  9 Feb 2004 02:25:33 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from freebsd@tern.ru)
Received: from mail.tern.ru (mail.tern.ru [192.168.1.140])
	by ns.tern.ru (X/X) with ESMTP id i19AQSYj065312
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:26:29 +0300
X-Spam-Filter: check_local@ns.tern.ru by digitalanswers.org
Received: from mail.tern.ru (localhost.tern.ru [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.tern.ru (X/X) with ESMTP id i19AS6H6069491
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org.VIRCHECK>;
	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:28:06 +0300 (MSK)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by mail.tern.ru (X/X) id i19AS6CR069489
	for freebsd-security@freebsd.org.VIRCHECK;
	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:28:06 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from snork.tern.ru (snork.tern.ru [192.168.1.133])
	by mail.tern.ru (X/X) with ESMTP id i19AS4H6069461;
	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:28:05 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:27:37 +0300
From: freebsd@tern.ru
Organization: Tern
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <445120208.20040209132737@tern.ru>
To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040206111051.GB724@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
References: <614479869.20040206131706@tern.ru>
 <20040206103833.GD4848@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
 <1424875954.20040206134618@tern.ru>
 <20040206111051.GB724@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re[2]: ipfw question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Alexandre Krasnov <tech@tern.ru>
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 10:25:34 -0000

It's funny. This (your) variant:

ipfw add count from IP1 not to { IP2,IP3 }

was accepted by ipfw but resulted in (was rewritten by ipfw as) the rule:

ipfw add count from IP1 to not IP2,IP3

So, I guess that my initial
ipfw add count from IP1 to not IP2,IP3
should be what I was looking for.

Thank you for your reply.
Indeed
not to { IP2,IP3 }
is more clear sentence from the point of human logic then the one used
by ipfw :)

Alex.


PP> On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:46:18PM +0300, freebsd@tern.ru wrote:
PP> [actually, I wrote]
>> PP> Could you try
>> PP>   ipfw add count from IP1 to not { IP2,IP3 }
>> 
>> Definitely I tried it already before writing to group. It does not
>> work.
>> Here is the exact error message for this try:
>> ipfw: hostname ``'' unknown

PP> Er, sorry, my mistake; could you try 'not to' instead of 'to not'? :)

PP> G'luck,
PP> Peter