Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:54:57 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org, Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r334593 - in head/dns: bind96 bind96/files bind98 bind98/files bind99 bind99/files Message-ID: <20131126075457.GB88351@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <529451E7.4010801@marino.st> References: <201311221341.rAMDfY3g002148@svn.freebsd.org> <01490d316b5dd7f01f1c843871542666@secure.marino.st> <2DEEB271-4795-4DF0-8F85-30316BA3070F@FreeBSD.org> <5291C8BD.3070109@marino.st> <20131126035339.GA43389@FreeBSD.org> <529451E7.4010801@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 08:46:47AM +0100, John Marino wrote: > However: > 1) There are OSVERSION in use that can easily be replaced by existence check > 2) Most OSVERSION checks could be moved to a separate, automatically > included makefile called "Makefile.FreeBSD". This functionality exists :) I prefer that other platforms included their Makefile.FooBSD instead. > today. Only FreeBSD platforms include Makefile.FreeBSD > 3) Any remaining OSVERSION use in Makefiles should have a sweep to add > OPSYS with it. > > I would encourage further discussion on portmgr@ list though, that's > where it has moved (well, at least attempted to be moved). I don't really see why it was/being discussed on portmgr@. It is more of technical issue than organizational one; ports@ or at least ports-committers@ looks more appropriate to me. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131126075457.GB88351>