From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 06:38:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75191106566B; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:38:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836DA8FC15; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA14917; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:38:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1MqhyP-000Gtf-7I; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:38:37 +0300 Message-ID: <4ABB13EC.3020202@icyb.net.ua> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:38:36 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090823) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcml1cyBNb3JrxatuYXM=?= References: <4ABA36B1.9070706@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sb600/sb700 ohci experimental patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:38:41 -0000 on 25/09/2009 01:31 Andrius Morkūnas said the following: > usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 > (hw power) control head <= 0xcfef1e30 > (hw power) control head => 0x2329000 > usbus1: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 > (hw power) control head <= 0xcfef1e40 > (hw power) control head => 0x4143000 These were the messages that I looked for the most. > If you need anything else, let me know. > > And thanks for the patch. Thank you very much for the testing and the detailed report! Unfortunately I have no clue about the umass issue. >From comparing attach after boot and attach during boot messages it seems that USB part worked almost identical, it's the CAM part that didn't happen in the second case. BTW, how many ports do you have at the back? If more than 2, could you please try connecting the mouse to a port that is not connected to uhub0 (this could be verified with usbconfig)? And then see if you still get a mouse attachment problem during boot? (No other devices during boot please :-) to simplify the testcase.) -- Andriy Gapon