From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 17 17:33:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6958B16A40F for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:33:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noeldude@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBCD13C46A for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noeldude@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so499756nzh for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:33:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hlHHt/GmvkeIn5hBL6KPcK8ES8uLGfORI6mDPR43JiM9uCXvu5z691NTWPQ179GCRl7QyJZHdMFEgHRKIdhONesthuai24Shgfik5vl+DCi99DRroNpJzBK1uMWDA+8u11AhNqZFGK/UPvnPHXa0Gt6acNyaQ6Y75wjlVVZyk30= Received: by 10.65.176.7 with SMTP id d7mr10407601qbp.1169055227226; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:33:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.156.16 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:33:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:33:47 -0600 From: "Noel Jones" To: "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: <45AE5BBB.6060805@qgsltd.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <000601c73a43$8683c170$6601880a@Enigma> <45AE5BBB.6060805@qgsltd.co.uk> Subject: Re: Load balancing outgoing mail relay X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:33:51 -0000 On 1/17/07, Charles Trevor wrote: > > What happens if you do multiple dig/nslookups for smarthost.domain.tld. > Are the records returned in a different order each time? If not the > problem may be at the NS. > Nope. Postfix shuffles equal-weight MX records internally, so it doesn't matter what order the NS presents them. Multiple A records without an MX record (or when MX lookups are suppressed) are treated as equal-weight MX records per RFC. This is likely a postfix configuration problem. The original poster should seek further help on the postfix-users list. http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail -- Noel Jones