Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 06:08:16 +0900 (JST) From: Yasuhiro KIMURA <yasu@utahime.org> To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Official opinion about new py3- port Message-ID: <20170810.060816.949087463497216767.yasu@utahime.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear portmgr. Would you mind my asking your official opinion about new py3- port? When I submitted new mail/py3-authres port, it was rejected with following comment: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220702#c2 > FYI, we no longer accept adding new py3- ports. FreeBSD will add > flavored package support instead. But today I found new security/py3-ecdsa port is committed, which conflicts with it. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=447640 I would like to make it clear because if new py3- port is permitted it provides another solution to the problem about mail/postfix-policyd-spf-python update. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 With best regards. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170810.060816.949087463497216767.yasu>