From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Aug 15 7:17:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647D537B400; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (wwweasel.geeksrus.net [64.8.210.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990EF43E42; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:17:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alane@wwweasel.geeksrus.net) Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (alane@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7FEHFcW008600; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:17:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from alane@wwweasel.geeksrus.net) Received: (from alane@localhost) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7FEHFFg008599; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:17:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from alane) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:17:15 -0400 From: Alan E To: "Brian T. Schellenberger" Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, shige@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xv patch for refresh problem Message-ID: <20020815141715.GA8569@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> References: <200208150932.34230.bts@babbleon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208150932.34230.bts@babbleon.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 09:32:34AM -0400, Brian T. Schellenberger wrote: > >[ooops . . . Hit send too soon. Forgot the primary recipient. Sorta >important.] > > >There is a bug in xv 3.10a that causes it not to refresh properly with recent >releases of XFree86 and FreeBSD. (Eg, it started getting really bad when I >upgraded to FreeBSD 4.6 and XFree86 4.2.) There's a command line option that fixes it, too. Do we need to do anything but force that on? The option is "-loadclear". -- AlanE KDE-FreeBSD Team To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message