From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 24 16:55:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8B116A4CE; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:55:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1829143D48; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:55:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7OGtVU2045494 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:55:32 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) id i7OGtZ97037976; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:55:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:55:35 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Harti Brandt Message-ID: <20040824165535.GH37217@ip.net.ua> References: <20040824130849.GA12431@megalogika.lt> <20040824170917.Y517@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <20040824163608.GD37217@ip.net.ua> <20040824184623.K517@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9ZOS6odDaRI+0hI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040824184623.K517@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: Tomas Verbaitis Subject: Re: problems during upgrade to RELENG_5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:55:37 -0000 --/9ZOS6odDaRI+0hI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 06:48:55PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >=20 > RE>On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 05:11:32PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: > RE>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Tomas Verbaitis wrote: > RE>>=20 > RE>> TV>2) Next failure was this: > RE>> TV>=3D=3D=3D> snmp_atm > RE>> TV>cat > RE>> TV>/usr/src/lib/libbsnmp/modules/snmp_atm/../../../../contrib/ngatm/= snmp_atm/atm_tree.def > RE>> TV>/usr/src/lib/libbsnmp/modules/snmp_atm/atm_freebsd.def | gensnmpt= ree -e > RE>> TV>begemotAtm > atm_oid.h > RE>> TV>line 110: junk after closing ')' > RE>>=20 > RE>> The problem seems to be that it is running an old gensnmptree from= =20 > RE>> /usr/bin although it should build and run a new one. Can you tell me= what=20 > RE>> is the __FreeBSD_version in /usr/include/osreldate.h on the system y= ou are=20 > RE>> trying to upgrade? > RE>>=20 > RE>Harti, nothing to worry about, you can safely close PR. This is what > RE>happens when people do "make includes" without understanding that it > RE>will ruin their build environment. ``make buildworld OSRELDATE=3D0'' > RE>usually helps these pour souls. ;) >=20 > Ok. I was now half an hour thinking about the versions. It was my fault= =20 > that I did not bump the FreeBSD_version then, so the actual commit of the= =20 > gensnmptree is between two version bumps. I choose the later one for the= =20 > check in Makefile.inc1 and think this should be safe. >=20 It should be okay, and I thought we already fixed this in Makefile.inc1 by using the correct __FreeBSD_version check. Ask for the ``ls -l /usr/include/osreldate.h /usr/bin/gensnmptree'' output when diagnosing the problem -- like I said, chances are good that people fooled their build environment to think it's more fresh than is actually. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --/9ZOS6odDaRI+0hI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBK3MHqRfpzJluFF4RAoORAKCLGRnprY0if2aVMvxl6vxkr6G5rgCfUoHS iKpXYrYPn6hn6rUQZHhIEls= =JSnj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9ZOS6odDaRI+0hI--