From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 5 08:33:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2906237B401 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail9.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E5A43FAF for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:33:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 26084 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2003 15:33:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 5 Jun 2003 15:33:01 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h55FX0p0010783; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:33:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20030604.145404.88473317.imp@bsdimp.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 11:33:00 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: "M. Warner Losh" cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: cableboy@charter.net cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2311] ACPI and PCI vs interrupt routing on Sony VAIO's X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:33:05 -0000 On 04-Jun-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: > John Baldwin writes: >: I'm currently working on making the PCI interrupt routing work for SMP >: and once that is done I plan to commit a change to make this >: >: #if defined(__ia64__) || defined(__i386__) >: >: However, if people find that the above patch fixes a lot of UP >: machines for now I might commit it. > > I know that my Fiva 205 works with ACPI as long as I enter the right > overrides to get the right interrupts. I've been using something > similar. > > However, why not all architectures? Ideally, all architectures would route all PCI interrupts, and that is a good goal. However, I'm going to leave that up to each platform to implement and then add themselves to this list. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/