From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 21 5:37:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aldan.algebra.com (bronx-ip-2-218.dynamic.ziplink.net [205.208.97.218]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36A837BACA for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 05:36:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (from mi@localhost) by aldan.algebra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA61899; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 08:34:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <200007211234.IAA61899@aldan.algebra.com> Subject: Re: No /boot/loader (dangerously dedicated) In-Reply-To: <39773ED9.B05E0EBE@rtci.com> from Thomas Stromberg at "Jul 20, 2000 02:03:05 pm" To: Thomas Stromberg Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 08:33:35 -0400 (EDT) Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" > As for geometry, I tried both with and without "dangerously => > dedicated." My understanding was that if I used the dos partition => > entry method that we should be able to pick up the geometry => > correctly, but should I try the old dos fdisk trick as well? Also, => > would the adaptec setting to translate >1G be affecting this? It's => > on currently, which it is on all my other motherboards of similar => > vintage. => => Your boot disk is now *required* (or will be very very soon) to have => a proper slice table in -CURRENT; dedicated disks are deprecated in => order to get a smarter boot0. Wait! Smarter then what? So it can boot NT and Win98 for some weenies, or, actually do something useful (not sure what, though)? Why am I to waste space (even so little) "to be compatible with other OSes", if there will never be any other OSes? =This would defititely help out at work, as I would no longer get the =question from all of our users during the install "Should I be =dedicated or not?" "Yes, you should" :) -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message