From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 4 3:56:34 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF3037B401 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:56:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B205A43F43 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:56:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 5A09F536F; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:56:30 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Dmitry Parfenov Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: OpenSSH 3.5p1 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 12:56:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <15864855797.20030204142801@itn.ru> (Dmitry Parfenov's message of "Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:28:01 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: <15864855797.20030204142801@itn.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dmitry Parfenov writes: > Feb 4 11:00:58 P1 sshd[48147]: pam_start: malloc failed for pam_conv > Feb 4 11:00:58 P1 sshd[48147]: fatal: PAM: initialisation failed > Feb 4 11:01:37 P1 sshd[53308]: pam_start: malloc failed for pam_conv > Feb 4 11:01:37 P1 sshd[53308]: fatal: PAM: initialisation failed That has already been fixed. I tested on a different machine than the one I committed from, and left out one last-minute patch before committing. The irony is that the patch in question did get committed to -CURRENT, where it's not needed... DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message