Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:12:21 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> To: Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: deciding UFS vs ZFS Message-ID: <20140714111221.5d4aaea9@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <53C326EE.1030405@my.hennepintech.edu> References: <20140713190308.GA9678@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20140714071443.42f615c5@X220.alogt.com> <53C326EE.1030405@my.hennepintech.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:40:14 -0500 Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> wrote: > On 2014.07.13 18:14, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > use UFS as long as you are working with a single disk and ZFS the > > moment you have more than one disk. > Checksumming and the COW features make ZFS quite attractive for > single-device pools as well. there are also other features which could make ZFS attractive for single disk systems. But moving to a second disk only makes ZFS not just attractive but basically a must. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140714111221.5d4aaea9>