From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 7 12:57:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.force9.co.uk [195.166.136.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D828514EED for ; Fri, 7 May 1999 12:57:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@lan.awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (keep.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.8]) by awfulhak.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA33696; Fri, 7 May 1999 20:56:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@lan.awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA00854; Fri, 7 May 1999 16:17:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199905071517.QAA00854@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: thierry.herbelot@alcatel.fr Cc: questions Subject: Re: Passive FTP with natd ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 07 May 1999 10:45:05 +0200." <3732A811.7F51584B@telspace.alcatel.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 16:17:12 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [.....] > Thus : is it possible to setup natd so as to modify FTP packets ? > (is there a specific rule to insert into rc.firewall ?) > > TIA > > TfH [.....] It already does - however, if you're not using the ftp port (21) to send the PORT command, libalias won't look for anything.... Also, there was an egcs bug in libalias (fixed by Louqi) that stopped the PORT command detection stuff working, but you said you sup'd in the last week, so that shouldn't be the problem.... -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message