From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 8 18:28:46 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA01694 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 18:28:46 -0700 Received: from expo.x.org (expo.x.org [198.112.45.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA01687 ; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 18:28:44 -0700 Received: from fedora.x.org by expo.x.org id AA02962; Sat, 8 Apr 95 21:28:13 -0400 Received: by fedora.x.org id AA00505; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 21:28:12 -0400 Message-Id: <9504090128.AA00505@fedora.x.org> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: Motif 2.0 In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 07 Apr 1995 14:01:19 PDT. <19663.797288479@freefall.cdrom.com> Organization: X Consortium Date: Sat, 08 Apr 1995 21:28:12 EDT From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > R6 is a superset of R5. To the extent that Motif relies on R5-isms, > > they're all still there in R6, with a lot fewer bugs. > > The real problem with compiling Motif 1.x under X11R6 is that the > config files clash - you can't simply copy one over the other, you > need to carefully merge them. Perhaps this has been something of what > people are talking about (and I hate it - XView and Interviews do the > same bloody thing). > > Has this been fixed in Motif 2.0? > > Jordan OSF's imake config has always been weak and I've always had to tweek it to get it to work. Whether 2.0 on R5 would have needed tweeking or not I don't know, I haven't used R5 in nearly two years. -- Kaleb