From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Dec  1  9:12:45 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3262837B401; Sun,  1 Dec 2002 09:12:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9160843EB2; Sun,  1 Dec 2002 09:12:43 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3])
	by fledge.watson.org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with SMTP id gB1HCbBF081364;
	Sun, 1 Dec 2002 12:12:37 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 12:12:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org
To: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>
Cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>,
	Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.ORG>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: [REPORT] Upgrade from 4.0-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT
In-Reply-To: <20021201121355.A26595@locore.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021201121130.75329A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:

> Apparently, On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 01:15:00PM -0200,
> 	Daniel C. Sobral said words to the effect of;
> 
> > There I go reply to all... <sigh>
> > 
> > IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
> > *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
> > here.
> 
> Agree, I don't see any use in supporting upgrades without going through
> 4.x-STABLE first. 

It's nice that you guys are in agreement on that fact, but perhaps you'd
like to do something constructive like to look at and review the patches?
Avoiding the install of a new make during a build is highly desirable,
even if you don't believe in updating from old RELENG_4.

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert@fledge.watson.org      Network Associates Laboratories




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message