Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:29:13 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 268490] [igb] [lagg] [vlan]: Intel i210 performance severely degraded Message-ID: <bug-268490-7501-yuCE3n2au6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-268490-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-268490-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268490 --- Comment #16 from Daniel Duerr <duerrd561@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Franco Fichtner from comment #15) Thanks. Unfortunately I cannot get any change in behavior with this flag. [root@nfs dd]# ifconfig igb0: flags=3D28943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,PPROMISC> metric 0 mtu 9000 options=3D800028<VLAN_MTU,JUMBO_MTU> ether 00:25:90:d6:e6:72 media: Ethernet 1000baseT <full-duplex> status: active nd6 options=3D29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> igb1: flags=3D28943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,PPROMISC> metric 0 mtu 9000 options=3D800028<VLAN_MTU,JUMBO_MTU> ether 00:25:90:d6:e6:72 hwaddr 00:25:90:d6:e6:73 media: Ethernet 1000baseT <full-duplex> status: active nd6 options=3D29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> lagg0: flags=3D8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric = 0 mtu 9000 options=3D800028<VLAN_MTU,JUMBO_MTU> ether 00:25:90:d6:e6:72 laggproto lacp lagghash l2,l3,l4 laggport: igb0 flags=3D1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING> laggport: igb1 flags=3D1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING> groups: lagg media: Ethernet autoselect status: active nd6 options=3D29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> lagg0.8: flags=3D28943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,PPROM= ISC> metric 0 mtu 9000 ether 00:25:90:d6:e6:72 inet 172.27.6.135 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 172.27.6.143 groups: vlan vlan: 8 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: lagg0 media: Ethernet autoselect status: active nd6 options=3D29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> Also, I don't believe this machine's interfaces would ever have been in PRO= MISC mode before. I get that there was a change about some implicit defaults, bu= t if I had seen PROMISC and or PPROMISC in the `ifconfig` output before, I would have thought something was wrong. :). Just saying, as even if this workarou= nd had worked, I wouldn't have considered this a normal running state. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-268490-7501-yuCE3n2au6>