From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 4 09:00:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E4816A4B3 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 09:00:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B33643FE3 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 09:00:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: by gw.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E55655485D; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 11:00:10 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 11:00:10 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Message-ID: <20031004160010.GA96970@hellblazer.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <200310032249.h93MnXS8047857@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:18.openssl X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 16:00:12 -0000 On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 03:22:42PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > Another question: can someone please confirm that mod_ssl.so from > apache 2.0.47 port is _not_ affected ? It _is_ affected, because it uses the affected portions of OpenSSL. > I have rebuilt libssl, libcrypto and installed them (they all differ > from the old libs after make install) and done a rebuild of > mod_ssl. But the new mod_ssl.so doesn't differ from the one > built late August: > > [ports]apache2/work/httpd-2.0.47/modules/ssl/.libs> md5 mod_ssl.so > MD5 (mod_ssl.so) = a4e31cf6e4aff5ca91f164d57eb68457 > > /usr/local/libexec/apache2> md5 mod_ssl.so > MD5 (mod_ssl.so) = a4e31cf6e4aff5ca91f164d57eb68457 > > Also diff does not say that the binary files would differ. mod_ssl.so uses dynamic linking. It would not require a rebuild nor would the compiler output necessarily change after a rebuild. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se