From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 16 18:59:54 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C218316A417; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gemini@geminix.org) Received: from geminix.org (geminix.org [213.73.82.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8010D13C44B; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gemini@geminix.org) Message-ID: <473DDF8F.4030805@geminix.org> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:21:03 +0100 From: Uwe Doering Organization: Private UNIX Site User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071106 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kmacy@FreeBSD.org References: <200711161728.lAGHSVJL022351@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200711161728.lAGHSVJL022351@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from gemini by geminix.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1It5oO-0005Jb-Ue; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:59:53 +0100 Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/70587: [vm] [patch] NULL pointer dereference in vm_pageout_scan() X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:59:54 -0000 kmacy@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: [vm] [patch] NULL pointer dereference in vm_pageout_scan() > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: kmacy > State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 16 17:27:58 UTC 2007 > State-Changed-Why: > > This sounds more like a transitory bad memory issue. Have you seen this in recent releases? The most recent FreeBSD version we use on our production servers is RELENG_4, for stability reasons. And since we have the patch from the PR installed on all these servers we've never had this issue again. This way, we of course can't say whether it would have happened again without the patch. As to a transitory bad memory issue, all our servers have ECC protected memory, which makes hardware induced memory corruption at least very unlikely, though not completely impossible. Regards, Uwe -- Uwe Doering | EscapeBox - Managed On-Demand UNIX Servers gemini@geminix.org | http://www.escapebox.net