From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jan 18 18:43:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37071CB5DE5 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:43:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stl@wiredrive.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x246.google.com (mail-wm0-x246.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF6781F21 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:43:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stl@wiredrive.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x246.google.com with SMTP id r126so4740895wmr.2 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:43:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wiredrive-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=N55jkulxWrT5X1A+hzQvQ5/0VPrZMVloITR2Pyr5AW4=; b=ktDou/aQul6hVClyb7PcVGTkNm0Rjc5G6nd3NyRfZhjs1qVQqwb+CoDDIHrtNCGbzK GBH82N7NccKOBLKSyqA20k3bR/0VNkmqfKGp/CTuPg51OlWKX8ACiT/F4VV/HHdPaDDx LH8B1CG3IDUhe06A1DX1LCLul9zzbUhK6MncZZvC0CLpWRgIyxY0d7cO/HrZR+hvZvxt f3ZY/58RzqwHqHMvaxdiqeD8V+qWJ64NbSg/tZJUyZFO6NiT0NVrfza7lDniKmLrlKAW ilDLPCXtH+qrSWR/ZNJJ/svfsbYMjUTGjtqO0aT8UpOriRccOsM9EoamDNntFr+p9hdn 1zZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=N55jkulxWrT5X1A+hzQvQ5/0VPrZMVloITR2Pyr5AW4=; b=F3orHnc3QnWbW+KTKRpiOHse7RF0MdG/jGm5i70YrvKYAUC2lySbVGnqBtTqRros7U abGjI3r0levfcPhrgA0g3BomeGgrsyuRBn8Q5rpv26xqzoEsQRb7rsW5f5nw84OzBxsi 8OeuUWkuF3ugvw8welCdckdlXLYgwMffrqVv+/guRfpPHhNwa7dS3Nxg2maZHYDKj6OO FyVwVqFvTT63VBbBkOSxfyz9uJ7hLL4GtA3SxBiGJFF7We6C5CKjoXPdjMukp4fuX+vc pcv4nLrcfePOE5ymwdOwElzBboPxBmHeIw92W/822itIBkYp3XJoEa0uuqJ0hE8pZf5E GWCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIrmnSvu3xxLyAYZx/17PbHzZfMDhtaiIsaZBx60cydsiVMUd1A0y2QuWUYci39lNN2X5A2tBptMPkrvAaA X-Received: by 10.223.135.69 with SMTP id 5mr4543803wrz.174.1484765011093; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:43:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.76.242 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:43:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <587F39E3.1060608@norma.perm.ru> References: <587F39E3.1060608@norma.perm.ru> From: Scott Larson Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:43:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: decent 40G network adapters To: "Eugene M. Zheganin" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:43:33 -0000 I can vouch for the Mellanox ConnectX-4 cards as working well, along with the Chelsio T5 stuff, both under heavy production usage in both routing and endpoint cases. In my testing the T5 was a slightly better option in situations demanding PPS with a higher ceiling and lower cpu utilization, but they came out essentially in a dead heat when testing for raw throughput. *[image: userimage]Scott Larson[image: los angeles] Lead Systems Administrator[image: wdlogo] [image: linkedin] [image: facebook] [image: twitter] [image: instagram] T 310 823 8238 <310%20823%208238%20x1106> | M 310 904 8818 <310%20904%208818>* On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > Could someone recommend a decent 40Gbit adapter that are proven to be > working under FreeBSD ? The intended purpose - iSCSI traffic, not much > pps, but rates definitely above 10G. I've tried Supermicro-manufactured > Intel XL710 ones (two boards, different servers - same sad story: > packets loss, server unresponsive, spikes), seems like they have a > problem in a driver (or firmware), and though Intel support states this > is because the Supermicro tampered with the adapter, I'm still > suspicious about ixl(4). I've also seen in the ML a guy reported the > exact same problem with ixl(4) as I have found. > > So, what would you say ? Chelsio ? > > Thanks. > Eugene. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >