From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 22 21:58:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C037E3 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:58:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlfbsd@kanar.ci0.org) Received: from kanar.ci0.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0b:1:150:ca0a:a9ff:fef1:a4c9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C9C52B62 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanar.ci0.org (pluxor@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanar.ci0.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9MLvjS9063522; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 23:57:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd@kanar.ci0.org) Received: (from mlfbsd@localhost) by kanar.ci0.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r9MLvjna063521; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 23:57:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 23:57:45 +0200 From: Olivier Houchard To: Berislav Purgar Subject: Re: AVILA kernel Message-ID: <20131022215744.GA63463@ci0.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:58:12 -0000 On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 07:54:03PM +0200, Berislav Purgar wrote: > :( .. still no solutions for this problem ? > > Beri Hi Berislav, I just tested, and apart from a few issues with the npe driver which I fixed, it seems to work fine. My board has 128MB of RAM, but I tried to limit it to 64MB, and it worked as well. Can you test the kernel at http://www.ci0.org/kernel and tell me if it works for you ? If not, I'll dig in my stuff to see if I can find another avila board. The only thing I can think of, on top of my mind, is I'm still using gcc to compile my kernels, and you may be using clang. As I don't think clang has been tested much with big-endian arm, maybe there're a few issues there. If you're using it, can you try to switch to gcc to see if it is any better ? Thanks ! Olivier