From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 14 09:28:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BF116A415; Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:28:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57D713C43E; Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 2A7D863B; Sun, 14 Jan 2007 03:28:18 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 03:28:18 -0600 To: Andrew Pantyukhin Message-ID: <20070114092818.GB1223@soaustin.net> References: <21940630@bsam.ru> <20061223211725.GB24163@soaustin.net> <20061224120420.0542dfdb@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20061224113035.GA25941@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon , Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: Overlong mailing-list maintainer address in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:28:19 -0000 On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 11:15:33PM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > Right. The question is, should we stick to shorter > form for maintainership or allow both forms being > used on a case-by-case basis. We should pick one or the other; otherwise, there are duplicate posts to the mailing lists from the reminder-mail from GNATS, among other annoyances. mcl