From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 18:55:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFA3106566C; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249338FC0C; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.30.101.53] ([209.117.142.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0PIiD7j010052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:44:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:44:07 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20120122201814.GA32081@thorin> <4F1DBB94.900@delphij.net> <0455F6A3-A04A-43C0-9E40-B19ABC4FDDAF@bsdimp.com> To: Robert Millan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:44:15 -0700 (MST) Cc: Kostik Belousov , Adrian Chadd , d@delphij.net, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: MK_BLOBS build option X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:55:38 -0000 On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Robert Millan wrote: > El 24 de gener de 2012 10:35, Robert Millan ha = escrit: >> El 23 de gener de 2012 23:13, Warner Losh ha escrit: >>> I like the idea, but hate the name. BLOB has a negative = connotation, and this option would seem to imply the project doesn't = like blobs, which isn't the case. Can we find a different name for this = please? >>=20 >> I'm open to suggestions. What would you call them? >=20 > I gave this some thought, looking for a more neutral term that is > still accurate. How about MK_SOURCELESS_CODE? I like that a lot better... Sorry I was slow in making a suggestion... Warner