From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Apr 7 20:17:34 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id UAA24591 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 7 Apr 1996 20:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA24585 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 1996 20:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Root.COM (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id UAA01852; Sun, 7 Apr 1996 20:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199604080316.UAA01852@Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: "Marc G. Fournier" cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , dob@nasvr1.cb.att.com, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: -current & "Connection attempt to..." console messages? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 07 Apr 1996 23:10:55 EDT." From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Sun, 07 Apr 1996 20:16:53 -0700 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> > What is meant by "non-existent port" logging? What is a "non-existent >> >port"? >> >> Ahem. In this case it means "a port for which there is no listener/socket". >> > So something like ftpd/identd that has to be started up by inetd each >time? No, not if inetd is listening on the port. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project