Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:03:50 +0000
From:      Yusuf Yaman <nxjoseph@protonmail.com>
To:        "stb@lassitu.de" <stb@lassitu.de>
Cc:        "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Requesting go1.24 in quarterly
Message-ID:  <yarNerHWL_7Sn0zhw447hAUpzcVAl_vqVi0uU06scFGwMuO1EA77E2g09aVyGhywNk5N9UfN0pNOLzB0IdQJ9Xug1WFsy5lKFwBbQimGePM=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5D53ED2E-FD6A-4F15-A0EA-7041E5795977@lassitu.de>
References:  <5D53ED2E-FD6A-4F15-A0EA-7041E5795977@lassitu.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

I had a port which should have been using go1.24 and that time it wasn't av=
ailable yet but some time after that, go1.24 was available and the port was=
 set to use go1.24 back then. IIRC, the port was fetching go1.24 in fetch s=
tage when go1.24 wasn't available in ports. I guess that your port can buil=
d successfully too by fetching go1.24 toolchain in fetch stage.

Sent from Proton Mail Android


-------- Original Message --------
On 6/21/25 12:59 PM, Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> wrote:

>  One of the ports I maintain (www/forgejo) is failing in quarterly becaus=
e the default version of go there appears to be less than 1.24, and the ups=
tream source build setup will try to install go1.24.
> =20
>  It seems that some time ago ports were clean up to not request specific =
go versions. How should I address this issue?
> =20
> =20
>  Thanks,
>  Stefan
> =20
>  --
>  Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>   Fon +49 175 3288861
> =20
> =20
>  



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yarNerHWL_7Sn0zhw447hAUpzcVAl_vqVi0uU06scFGwMuO1EA77E2g09aVyGhywNk5N9UfN0pNOLzB0IdQJ9Xug1WFsy5lKFwBbQimGePM=>