Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 05 Jun 2000 01:49:03 -0700
From:      "Raymundo M. Vega" <RaymundoVega@home.com>
To:        Troy Settle <troy@picus.com>
Cc:        Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: IP vs CNAME
Message-ID:  <393B697F.F3BFBA8B@home.com>
References:  <FCEELIAEIIECDGKKJLMIAECJCAAA.troy@picus.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Troy Settle wrote:
> 
> ** -----Original Message-----
> ** From: Raymundo M. Vega
> **
> ** if this is the file for bind, then where is the address of
> ** webhost.isp.net
> ** mailhost.isp.net
> **
> 
> That information would have been in the 'isp.net' zone file, which was not
> shown.  Use your imagination.  Don't expect someone to spell out the
> entire thing for the sake of an example (same reason I didn't put the SOA
> in the first post).
> 
> ** you are not telling bind those address...it works like magic, but
> ** it needs a little help from us.
> 
> Yeah.. that part was left as an excercise to the reader.
> 
> Now.. as for the Zone file that I screwed up...
> 
> @       IN      SOA     ns1.isp.net. hostmaster.isp.net. (
>                2000060401  10800  3600  3600000  86400 )
>         IN    MX  10   mailhost.isp.net.
>         IN    MX  20   spooler.isp.net.
>         IN    NS       ns1.isp.net.
>         IN    NS       ns2.isp.net.
> @       IN    A        ip.address.of.webhost
> www     IN    CNAME    @
> mail    IN    CNAME    mailhost.isp.net.
> 
> This is indeed what 180 or so zones looked like on my name servers (before
> my ISP was acquired).  My only mistake in prior posts, was in assuming
> that you could do a CNAME on the origin.  Thanks Doug for setting me
> straight.
> 
> Anyways, back to the originial question... it doesn't matter if you use
> name-based or ip-based virtual hosts.  The DNS config is equally easy for
> both.  Every major browser released in the last 5 years or so should
> support HTTP/1.1, so it's really a non issue on that front.
> 
> With name-based virtual hosts, it's sometimes more difficult to track down
> problems, and you may be generating additional problems on secure sites
> (I'm told this, I don't know from personal experience).
> 
> With ip-based virtual hosts, you 'waste' ip addresses.  Renumbering will
> be a bigger and bigger bitch with every host you add.
> 
> -Troy


read RFC1912 page 5

raymundo


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?393B697F.F3BFBA8B>