Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:30:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Danny Do <ai_quoc@hotmail.com> Cc: "'Diego F. Arias R.'" <dak.col@gmail.com>, 'Bill Moran' <wmoran@potentialtech.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Hard disk bottle neck. Message-ID: <20080928193017.P97512@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <BAY139-DAV669B7DDAFDA22CE57BA8F90410@phx.gbl> References: <00d101c92154$691f53c0$3b5dfb40$@com> <48DF78C3.9080401@infracaninophile.co.uk> <BAY139-DAV95C49C49907D7EFE01A0190410@phx.gbl> <20080928165534.X96877@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080928121713.5c905a40.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <3b93bd110809280925i2a99efd7qf733658d7c23fd74@mail.gmail.com> <BAY139-DAV669B7DDAFDA22CE57BA8F90410@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The reason I use RAID5 because I don't want to waste too much space on redundancy whilst taking the advantage of read. Over 99% of disk access are expected to be reading. in that case - RAID5 is perfect, just properly set up.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080928193017.P97512>