From owner-freebsd-smp  Mon Apr 28 10:56:29 1997
Return-Path: <owner-smp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA27770
          for smp-outgoing; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 10:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA27761
          for <smp@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 10:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA02242; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 10:53:58 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199704281753.KAA02242@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Quad Pro 150 motherboard?
To: black@zen.cypher.net (Ben Black)
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 10:53:58 -0700 (MST)
Cc: michaelv@MindBender.serv.net, csubl@csv.warwick.ac.uk, smp@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970428034725.32065W-100000@zen.cypher.net> from "Ben Black" at Apr 28, 97 03:48:49 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > >(hint: NT4 Workstation can't handle more than 2CPUs and that is the most 
> > >popular commercial SMP-capable OS)
> > 
> > Bullshit.
> > 
> 
> perhaps you'd like to clarify.  NT *server* can handle more CPUs, but NT 
> *workstation* is limited to 2.  if you have a microsoft URL i can peruse 
> to dispute that, i'd be happy to admit my mistake.  but i doubt you can 
> provide such a thing.

Maybe he was disputing the claim that it's the "most popular commercial
SMP-capable OS".

8-) 8-).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.