From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Dec 31 10:59:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA04341 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 10:59:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from oz.wj.com (oz.wj.com [204.30.16.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA04336 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 10:59:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alan@bali.seg.wj.com) Received: from bali.seg.wj.com (bali.seg.wj.com [144.172.1.232]) by oz.wj.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA21075 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 10:58:46 -0800 (PST) Received: (from alan@localhost) by bali.seg.wj.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA21510 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 10:58:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19981231105845.A21506@wj.com> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 10:58:45 -0800 From: Alan Strassberg To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: production box: -STABLE or -RELEASE ? Reply-To: alan@wj.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG For production is -STABLE or -RELEASE preferrable ? Or both ;-) alan -- alan@wj.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message