Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Jul 2014 08:43:28 +0100
From:      krad <kraduk@gmail.com>
To:        Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: deciding UFS vs ZFS
Message-ID:  <CALfReycBx-PWBtqCh7Z3UpPVbCRc1cEYy3Xu%2Bx43kA%2BY4ssSrg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <53C326EE.1030405@my.hennepintech.edu>
References:  <20140713190308.GA9678@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20140714071443.42f615c5@X220.alogt.com> <53C326EE.1030405@my.hennepintech.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
dont forget boot enviroments


On 14 July 2014 01:40, Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> wrote:

> On 2014.07.13 18:14, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > use UFS as long as you are working with a single disk and ZFS the
> > moment you have more than one disk.
> Checksumming and the COW features make ZFS quite attractive for
> single-device
> pools as well.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALfReycBx-PWBtqCh7Z3UpPVbCRc1cEYy3Xu%2Bx43kA%2BY4ssSrg>