From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 24 13:35:22 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600F116A41F
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:35:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from peter@dataloss.nl)
Received: from useful.dataloss.nl (useful.dataloss.nl [80.84.249.161])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AACFF43D49
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:35:21 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from peter@dataloss.nl)
Received: (qmail 38801 invoked by uid 1001); 24 Sep 2005 13:35:19 -0000
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 15:35:19 +0200
From: Peter van Dijk <peter@dataloss.nl>
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20050924133519.GI17888@dataloss.nl>
References: <200509241525.16173.max@love2party.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CEUtFxTsmBsHRLs3"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200509241525.16173.max@love2party.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Subject: Re: Bridges
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:35:22 -0000


--CEUtFxTsmBsHRLs3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 03:25:06PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> Objections against soon retirement of bridge.c in HEAD?

One argument in favour of retirement: last time I checked (FreeBSD
6.0-BETA2 I think), bridge.ko is a recipe for instant panic on
sparc64. Although now I wonder whether the same is still true for
ng_bridge.

I'm a happy if_bridge user now :)

Cheers, Peter
--=20
peter@dataloss.nl        | ~ tonight tonight, what is this potion
http://blog.dataloss.nl/ | ~ that makes a fool of me
UnderNet/#clue           |     Wayfinder, fr-025 soundtrack

--CEUtFxTsmBsHRLs3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDNVYV7JEU4tMwuvwRArZXAKDI1gxe/1ks1BQFXBFDG7GfI0HmQQCfQILo
40PERn0Q0HkT9le0QXlbkGo=
=G6Sj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--CEUtFxTsmBsHRLs3--