From owner-freebsd-standards Tue Feb 26 10:24:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E7237B477 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 10:24:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA23783; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 05:23:59 +1100 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 05:24:19 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: Bill Fenner Cc: Subject: Re: scanf(3) patches for review In-Reply-To: <200202261648.IAA20603@windsor.research.att.com> Message-ID: <20020227051758.Y45742-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Bill Fenner wrote: > >Strictly, uintmax_t is not suitable for storing pointers. > > I thought uintmax_t was the largest integer type, and uintptr_t was > an integer type large enough to store a pointer -- so > sizeof(uintmax_t) >= sizeof(uintptr_t). Strictly, uintptr_t might not exist. Of course, we are unlikely to support machines where it doesn't. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message