Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
To:        Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sparc64/sbus sbus.c
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207251350430.24641-100000@beppo>
In-Reply-To: <20020725162855.F4442@locore.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Yes.

The orginal code, imported from NetBSD, points off into never never land for
the 'clear' register if you use the INTVEC as a plain index. I dunno how it
could possibly work in NetBSD. You need to take an index which is between
slots 0 && 4 (* 64) and take interrupt priority (*8) to index to the correct
clear register.

On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:

> Apparently, On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 01:15:00PM -0700,
> 	Matt Jacob said words to the effect of;
> 
> > mjacob      2002/07/25 13:15:00 PDT
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     sys/sparc64/sbus     sbus.c 
> >   Log:
> >   Set interrupt clear pointer for SBus slots to point to correct spot.
> 
> Does this get your isp sbus card going?
> 
> Jake
> 
> >   
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   1.4       +2 -2      src/sys/sparc64/sbus/sbus.c
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0207251350430.24641-100000>